Bush asks for more visas
for high-tech workers
By Rebecca
Knight in Boston, FT.com
Published: February 2 2006 21:13 | Last
updated: February 2 2006 21:13
President George W. Bush, who is touring the country as
part of a weeks-long campaign to promote his 2006 agenda, called on
Congress yesterday to raise the number of visas that allow companies
to fill high-tech jobs with foreign workers.
gThe problem is ...that Congress has limited the number of H-1B
visas,h Mr Bush said, referring to the name of the official passport
endorsement. gI think itfs a mistake not to encourage more really
bright folks who can fill the jobs that are having trouble being
filled in America, to limit their number.? So I call upon Congress
to be realistic and reasonable to raise that cap.h
The H-1B visa, which allows US employers to have access to highly
educated foreign professionals, many of whom work in scientific
research, medicine and technology, has been a point of contention
between business and government over the past two years. High-tech
industries battling talent shortages blame the visa programmefs low
cap on approved new workers.
In 1990 - the year it took effect - the cap was set at 65,000.
That number was progressively raised by Congress during the
technology boom and hit an all-time high for fiscal years 2001
through to 2003, at 195,000. In 2004, however, the cap dropped back
to 65,000 and has stayed there since.
gItfs clear we donft have enough workers with math and science
degrees and in a workforce of 140m a cap of 65,000 is way too low,h
said Randy Johnson, the vice-president for labour, immigration and
employee benefits at the US Chamber of Commerce. gThe cap has filled
almost immediately over the past two years.h
Sandra Boyd, at the National Association of Manufacturers, the
industry body, said that reforms to both the H-1B visa and green
card programmes were key to helping US employers maintain their
ability to create jobs in the US.
But Richard Elmore, a senior research fellow at the consortium
for policy research in education at Harvard University, said the
proposed change was little more than a gstop-gap measureh.
gI donft have anything against inviting people in but it doesnft
address the main problem and that is the fairly major
underinvestment in education in this country,h he said. gWe havenft
built the talent pool.h